BlogGeneralAccelerating the process of rehabilitation through virtual reality: The standing point of Reh@Task in post-stroke disability

Accelerating the process of rehabilitation through virtual reality: The standing point of Reh@Task in post-stroke disability

rehabilitation through virtual reality

Authors: Livia Popa, Victor Dabala
Keywords: virtual, reality, stroke, cognitive, motor, Reh@Task

Can we accelerate the process of rehabilitation through virtual reality?

Cognitive and motor impairment are often associated with acquired brain injury, leading to poor quality of life for patients and their families. Different unconventional rehabilitation methods have recently been developed for several neurological diseases, including stroke [1]. Virtual Reality (VR) involves specific software-generated actions performed by the patient, facilitating the improvement of motor disability and cognition impairment. A vital advantage of VR is the immediate availability of feedback on the generated actions of the patient. Learn more about the recovery of precise hand movements after stroke.

While at the start of the implementation process, VR was used for testing a single-dimensional aspect of post-stroke disability, the paradigm has shifted to a more multimodal integrated procedure. Specific tasks, like the Reh@Task (a customizable multi-purpose VR scenario possessing both cognitive and motor test parts), combine the following domains of rehabilitation: attention assessment, memory testing, and upper-limb rehabilitation [1].

Versions of Reh@Tasks

Fig 1 Versions of Reh@Tasks

Figure 1. Versions of Reh@tasks


Multiple versions of the Reh@Task have been tested in the past (Figure 1). Its first version involved an attention-testing process in discriminating specifically marked symbols within a conglomeration of different elements [2]. The next prototype was further enriched to enable attention, upper limb, and memory training, focusing on emotionally-driven stimuli [3]. The current Reh@Task prototype, employed by Faria et al. (2018) in a pilot study from 2018, contains neutral stimuli with the addition of an increase in difficulty as the task is completed [1].

The VR rehabilitation method has been developed after consulting multiple healthcare professionals, with the aid of voluntary participants, to create the level design [1].

Reh@Task setup


fpsyg 09 00854 g001

Figure 2. Testing conditions. (A) A tabletop is presented to the patient, recording the arm motricity by pattern-identification trackers. These movements are superimposed with the ones of a virtual arm. (B) Multiple visual stimuli are randomly generated, from colored letters to numbers or symbols. A particular aspect of the whole method is the increased difficulty encountered by the patient as the training evolves [1].From

The difficulty is increased incrementally with a variety of different parameters, such as the manipulation of the number of targets and distracting elements, the change or addition of different categories of stimuli, the time available for the patients to solve the levels, the time available for the selection of the symbols/numbers/letters, the amount of time for memorizing the target (in-memory variants) [1].

A higher difficulty level is characterized by the appearance of an increased number of visual elements, a reduction in the available time for both memorizing and finishing the task, and the action selection is quicker.

For the duration of the rehabilitation method, the patient has the opportunity to increase the time for solving the task when failing to finish within the allocated time. This bonus is available for three consecutive times. If the subject spends extra time without completing the level where it encountered difficulties, the program will send the patient to the previous level. If the completion is succeeded with the aid of extra time, the software will restart the level, asking the patient to resolve the task without the bonus time [1].

Reh@Task in post-stroke disability

Faria and collaborators pinpointed that Reh@Task may be an alternative to standard occupational rehabilitation and improve motor and cognitive outcomes compared to patients in standard rehabilitation conditions [1].

Their study enrolled 24 patients with chronic brain ischemia (>6 months) after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria presented in Figure 3 below:

Fig 3 Reh@Task Eligibility Criteria

Figure 3. Eligibility Criteria


Interventions and clinical assessment 

To ensure a clear understating and familiarization with software interface instructions of the VR tasks, before the first session, subjects in the experimental group underwent an average of three short training trials with the Reh@Task. Each participant in the VR group followed 12 sessions of 45 min with the Reh@Task, three times a week for 1 month. The intervention in the control group was time-matched, including twelve sessions of 45 min of standard occupational therapy, with temporospatial orientation activities and writing training. Moreover, subjects in both groups participated in 2 to 3 weekly sessions of 45–60 minutes of conventional occupational therapy focusing on motor training (fine motor skills, dexterity training) of the upper limb, balance training, and cognitive and communication training. 

Several standardized clinical scales were used to evaluate motor and cognitive functions at baseline, end of treatment, and 1-month follow-up in both groups, as highlighted in Figure 4 below [1].  

Fig 4 Clinical Scales for the Evaluation of Motor and Cognitive Functions

Figure 4. Standardized Scales for the Evaluation of Motor and Cognitive Function

Those scales were previously associated with the Reh@Task  to measure the impairment severity pre-and post-intervention [25].  

Study results 

  • The Efficacy of Cognitive Training with Reh@Task compared to Conventional Rehabilitation

At baseline, end of treatment, and follow-up, the analysis of the cognitive scores displayed a significant impact on MoCA total score in both groups. However, the VR group showed a significant impact on MoCA-Total, and one of its subdomains (MoCA-Orientation) compared to the control population, whose scores represent different MoCA aspects (MoCA-Total, MoCA-Language, and MoCA-Recall). The improvement rate was significant in both interventional groups at the end of the assessment [1].

  • The Efficacy of Motor Training with Reh@Task compared to Conventional Rehabilitation

Considering the three evaluation moments, the CAHAI, Barthel Index, and MAS scores for motor assessment were balanced at baseline between the two groups. For FMAT, higher scores were registered in the control group [1].

In the VR group, the improvement for FM – Arm compared to the control group was significantly higher at the end of treatment and significant during follow-up. Results regarding decreased spasticity were recorded for the control population, acknowledging a relevant effect in the MAS score (with a reduction from +1 to 1). For the FM-hand and wrist domain, results were significant for the baseline period, while for the end of treatment and follow-up, conclusions were labeled as modest in terms of significance. Over time, there were no major differences between groups at the end of treatment and follow-up, except for the FM- Arm in the VR group at the end of treatment [1]. The most significant results were registered in the FMAT upper-arm category, demonstrating the beneficial effects of Reh@Task in superior limb rehabilitation [1].

  • Task performance evolution 

Several variables were taken into account for assessing the evolution of patients in the VR group: the difficulty level achieved during each training session, the type of task (attention/memory), and the type of stimulus. For both tasks proposed during VR training with Reh@Task, improvement rates were recorded in both the attention and memory dimensions. Following the increase in task difficulty, a decrease in positive results was observed as a general rule. Outcomes registered in the memory tasks expressed a slowly ascending improvement rate in comparison to the attentional tests, where results were more rapidly acquired.

Patients displayed distinct performances when it came to the type of stimulus (numbers, colored numbers, letters, colored letters, symbols, colored symbols). The difficulty was consistent with the level of abstraction of each category [1, 2, 4].

When considering the outcomes in the motor performance measures, the analysis of movement trajectories offered information on both ranges of movement and the smoothness of movements. The interventional study compared movement smoothness between the first and the last training sessions and revealed a significant decrease in movement segments, indicating longer and smoother trajectories [1, 5, 6]. 

Conclusions on the process of rehabilitation through virtual reality

The work of Faria et al. [1] compared to the motor and cognitive training with Reh@Task in addition to conventional occupational therapy to standard occupational rehabilitation alone to discover the benefits of an integrative VR approach for stroke recovery, which combines cognitive and motor training [1].

The authors emphasized several limitations encountered during Reh@Task research, namely mild cognitive and motor improvement and a reduction in the impact of the intervention for those participants where the cognition deficit developed after the motor impairment [1].

Patients showed motor improvements in both groups, but in the FM-UE in the VR group, the improvements were twice those for the control group. The impact of both VR and control measures on cognitive function was significant but not different between groups. Both groups displayed improvements in attention, but in the VR group, the performance data showed significant improvements in both memory and attention training over time [1]. Compared to the control, a more significant impact was experienced by the intervention group on motor function than on cognitive function.

As highlighted by the study, Reh@Task represents a low-cost rehabilitation solution that combines motor and cognitive training and can be deployed at home or in the clinic. This research is a valuable step towards building more rehabilitation technologies that combine motor and cognitive training relying on virtual reality [1].


  1. Faria AL, Cameirão MS, Couras JF, Aguiar JRO et al. Combined Cognitive-Motor Rehabilitation in Virtual Reality Improves Motor Outcomes in Chronic Stroke – A Pilot Study. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:854. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00854. 
  2. Faria, AL, Andrade A, Soares L, and Bermúdez i Badia S. Benefits of virtual reality based cognitive rehabilitation through simulated activities of daily living: a randomized controlled trial with stroke patients. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 2016a. 13:96. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0204-z
  3. Cameirão MS, Pereira F, and Bermúdez i Badia S. “Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR).” (2017). Available at: 
  4. Faria AL, Vourvopoulos A, Cameirão MS, Fernandes J, and Bermúdez i Badia S. “An integrative virtual reality cognitive-motor intervention approach in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot study,” in Proceedings of the 10th Intl Conf. Disability, Virtual Reality & Associated Technologies, Gothenburg 2014. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.1.4967.8887
  5. Faria AL, Couras J, Cameirão MS, Paulino T et al (2016b). “Impact of combined cognitive and motor rehabilitation in a virtual reality task: an on-going longitudinal study in the chronic phase of stroke,” in Proceedings of the 11th ICDVRAT, Los Angeles, CA. Available at:
  6. Faria AL and Bermúdez i Badia S. “Development and evaluation of a web-based cognitive task generator for personalized cognitive training: a proof of concept study with stroke patients,” in Proceedings of the REHAB 2015: 3rd Workshop on ICTs for Improving Patients Research Techniques (Lisboa: ACM) 2015. doi: 10.1145/2838944.2838945

One thought on “Accelerating the process of rehabilitation through virtual reality: The standing point of Reh@Task in post-stroke disability

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Contact: [email protected]

Administrative Office: Cluj-Napoca, Romania

EFNR is the main forum for all professionals interested in neurorehabilitation across Europe. 


© EFNR 2022. Developed by & Digital Strategy by BlogDigital